Erickson, Ruth v. Berryhill, Nancy

Filing 15

ORDER granting 14 Motion to Remand to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of Section 205 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/4/2018. (jls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RUTH ALICE ERICKSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:17-cv-804-jdp V. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Deputy Commissioner for Operations, performing the duties and functions not reserv ed to the Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to r emand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, h ereby enters a judgm ent under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner' s decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Sh.alala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); M elkonyan v . Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991). On remand, an administrative law judge (ALJ) will reconsider the opinions of Roland R. More, M .D. and Ursula Berger, MSSW, LCSW. The ALJ will reconsider Plaintiff's allegations, consistent with applicable regulations rules and regulations, and reevaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity. If necessary, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony to assist in reaching findings at steps four and/ or five. The ALJ shall issue a de novo decision consistent with all applicable rules and regulations. SO ORDERED this tf'M day of April, 2018. United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?