Nelson, Darryl et al v. Doe et al

Filing 32

ORDER that this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The clerk's office is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/25/2020. (rks),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DARRYL NELSON, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 17-cv-846-wmc JASON CHATMAN, BRIANNA NOWAK, KYLE SLAMA, KENNETH CORNELIUS, CHARLIE BERGREN, and JEFFREY NYUGEN, Defendants. Pro se plaintiff Darryl Nelson, an inmate with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, incarcerated at Columbia Correctional Institution (“CCI”), was granted leave to proceed against defendants, all employees of the DOC, employed at CCI, on a claim that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to protect him from another inmate. Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, in part relying on plaintiff’s failure to respond to various requests for admissions. (Dkt. #28.) Plaintiff, however, also failed to respond to defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, nor did he request an extension of time to respond. In an order dated February 6, 2020, the court provided plaintiff one last chance to keep his claims alive, and warned him that if he did not respond by February 20, 2020, “the court will dismiss Nelson’s claims with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Nelson’s failure to prosecute it.” (2/6/20 Order (dkt. #30).) That date has now passed without any response from Nelson. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The clerk’s office is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Entered this 25th day of February, 2020. BY THE COURT: /s/ __________________________________ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?