Nelson, Darryl et al v. Doe et al
Filing
32
ORDER that this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The clerk's office is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 2/25/2020. (rks),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DARRYL NELSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
17-cv-846-wmc
JASON CHATMAN, BRIANNA NOWAK,
KYLE SLAMA, KENNETH CORNELIUS,
CHARLIE BERGREN, and JEFFREY NYUGEN,
Defendants.
Pro se plaintiff Darryl Nelson, an inmate with the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections, incarcerated at Columbia Correctional Institution (“CCI”), was granted leave
to proceed against defendants, all employees of the DOC, employed at CCI, on a claim
that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to protect him from
another inmate. Defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, in part relying on
plaintiff’s failure to respond to various requests for admissions. (Dkt. #28.) Plaintiff,
however, also failed to respond to defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings, nor
did he request an extension of time to respond. In an order dated February 6, 2020, the
court provided plaintiff one last chance to keep his claims alive, and warned him that if he
did not respond by February 20, 2020, “the court will dismiss Nelson’s claims with
prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Nelson’s failure to prosecute it.”
(2/6/20 Order (dkt. #30).) That date has now passed without any response from Nelson.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The clerk’s office is directed to enter
judgment accordingly.
Entered this 25th day of February, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
__________________________________
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?