Bartholomew, Bart v. Baron, Veronika et al

Filing 3

ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/8/2018. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BART ALAN BARTHOLOMEW , Plaintiff, v. ORDER Case No. 18-cv-08-wmc VERONIKA BARON and STEPHANIE MARQUARDT, Defendants. BART ALAN BARTHOLOMEW , Plaintiff, v. ORDER Case No. 18-cv-09-wmc ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES and ASSOCIATED BANK CORPORATION, Defendants. BART ALAN BARTHOLOMEW , Plaintiff, v. ORDER Case No. 18-cv-10-wmc CHRYSLER CAPITAL, Defendant. Plaintiff Bart Alan Bartholomew has filed three proposed civil complaints. Plaintiff seeks to commence these lawsuits without prepayment of the filing fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. From the affidavit of indigency plaintiff has submitted, I find that plaintiff is unable to prepay the fees and costs of commencing this action or to give security therefor. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Bart Alan Bartholomew’s petition for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees is GRANTED. 2. No further action will be taken in these cases until the court has screened the complaints pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to determine whether a case must be dismissed because the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. Once the screening process is complete, a separate order will issue. Entered this 8th day of January 2018. BY THE COURT: /s/ PETER OPPENEER Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?