Allen, Cecil v. Lazarz, Sara et al
ORDER that Plaintiff Cecil Glenn Allen may have until 2/1/2018 to submit six-month Inmate Account Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/10/2018. (nln),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
CECIL GLENN ALLEN,
Case No. 18-cv-22-wmc
SARA LAZARZ, JEFF MOESSNER,
and MIKE FELTON,
Plaintiff Cecil Glenn Allen, an inmate in the custody of the Eau Claire County Jail, has
filed a proposed civil complaint. Plaintiff has also submitted an inmate account statement,
which I construe as a request leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. However, a
decision regarding plaintiff’s indigency status cannot be made at this time because the inmate
account statement plaintiff submitted does not cover the entire six-month period immediately
preceding the filing of the complaint.
For this case to proceed, plaintiff must submit a certified copy of an inmate account
statement for the entire six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint
beginning approximately July 7, 2017 and ending approximately January 7, 2018. If I find that
plaintiff is indigent, I will calculate an initial partial payment amount that must be paid before
the court can screen the merits of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Thereafter,
plaintiff will be required to pay the balance of the filing fee in installments.
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Cecil Glenn Allen may have until February 1, 2018 to
submit a certified inmate account statement for the period beginning approximately July 7,
2017 and ending approximately January 7, 2018. If, by February 1, 2018, plaintiff fails to
respond to this order, I will assume that plaintiff wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily.
In that event, the case will be closed without prejudice to plaintiff filing the case at a later date.
Entered this 10th day of January, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?