United States of America v. $8,400 in United States Currency

Filing 16

ORDER granting 11 Motion for Default Judgment as to James Unser. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 6/13/2018. (voc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No.: 18-cv-56-wmc V. $8,400.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY, Defendant. ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINS'.f JAMI;'.S v\:· UNSER "' .,. ,. ~ ~ The United States of A~erica, by its attorney, Scott C. Blader, United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, by Elizabeth Altman, Assistant United . States Attorney, the government filed a Verified Complajpt of Forfeiture In Rem against .... $8,400.00 United States Cu~rency. ~ .t • ~..... .... The complaint alleges that the a.efendant currency was furnished or intended to be furnished in exchange for a controlled substance, was proceeds traceable to such an exchange, or was moneys used or intended to be used to facilitate a violation of Title II of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq. As such, the currency is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). Notice of this action was accomplished by service to all persons known by the government to have an interest in the defendant. No claim, answer, or other responsive pleadings have been filed pursuant to Rule G (4) and (5) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions. The United States of America has made application to this Court for a default judgment to be entered against James W. Unser, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDICATED, AND DECREED that: 1. The Default Judgment of Forfeiture is hereby entered whereby all right, title, and interest of James W. Unser in the defendant, is conveyed to the Plaintiff, United States of America. DATED: -:f\,\.V\.€, \ °3, J_e)~ I CfuA)f.. Entered this { ~ day of,May-2018. United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?