Kuehl, Christa v. Berryhill, Nancy
ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees. The court APPROVES a representative fee of $1,642. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/3/2021. (kwf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Commissioner of Social Security,
Dana Duncan, counsel for plaintiff Christa Kuehl, moves under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) for
a fee award of $9,442.00 after plaintiff was awarded $37,768.00 in past-due benefits.
Counsel’s requested fee represents 25% of plaintiff’s past-due benefits, so it falls within the
amount allowed by statute and the parties’ fee agreement. See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S.
789, 792 (2002); Dkt. 28-1. The commissioner does not oppose counsel’s fee request, but he
pointed out an error in counsel’s original fee request. Dkt. 30. Counsel has amended his request
accordingly. Dkt. 31.
The total amount of time that counsel’s firm spent on this case for proceedings in this
court was 50.15 hours, resulting in a proposed effective rate of $188 an hour. Of the 50.15
hours, 37.3 hours was attorney time and the remainder was for counsel’s legal assistants. Dkt
28-3. Counsel’s requested fee is well within the bounds of what is reasonable in light of
counsel’s experience, his risk of non-recovery, the work he performed, the results he obtained,
and the amounts awarded in similar cases. Therefore, the court will grant counsel’s motion. For
The court has changed the caption in this case to reflect that Andrew M. Saul was confirmed
as the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration after Kuel filed this lawsuit.
simplicity, the court will subtract the $7,800 fee that counsel received under the Equal Access
to Justice Act, which would otherwise have to be refunded to plaintiff.
IT IS ORDERED that Dana W. Duncan’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C.
§ 406(b), Dkt. 28, is GRANTED. The court APPROVES a representative fee of $1,642.
Entered June 3, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
JAMES D. PETERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?