Acosta, Reinaldo v. Stanley Correctional Institution

Filing 9

ORDER that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), this case is dismissed with prejudice for petitioner Reinaldo Acosta's failure to prosecute it. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN REINALDO ACOSTA, Petitioner, ORDER v. Case No. 18-cv-143-wmc STANLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. Pro se petitioner Reinaldo Acosta, a prisoner in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections at the Stanley Correctional Institution, filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus on March 1, 2018. On July 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker entered an order directing Acosta to supplement his petition with facts showing that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. The magistrate advised Acosta that the court would likely dismiss the petition if he did not file his brief by August 27, 2018. (Dkt. #6.) That deadline has passed, but Acosta has not filed a supplement to his petition or a motion for an extension of time. As a result, the court will dismiss the petition with prejudice. Hill v. United States, 762 F.3d 589, 591 (7th Cir. 2014) (“[D]ismissal for failure to prosecute is presumptively with prejudice.”). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), this case is dismissed with prejudice for petitioner Reinaldo Acosta’s failure to prosecute it. 2. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Entered this 17th day of September, 2018. BY THE COURT: /s/ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?