Saunders, Raymond v. Bell, Dr. et al

Filing 4

ORDER denying petitioner's #2 Motion to Waive the Filing Fee. Trust Fund Account Statement due 11/18/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew R. Wiseman on 10/25/2024. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RAYMOND SAUNDERS, Petitioner, ORDER v. Case No. 24-cv-749-wmc DR. BELL and OXFORD FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MEDICAL STAFFS, Respondent. Petitioner Raymond Saunders seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has neither paid the $5 filing fee nor requested leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Petitioner has filed a motion to waive the $5 filing fee; however, petitioner does not submit any evidence to show his present indigency status. For this case to move forward, petitioner must pay the $5 filing fee or submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee no later than November 18, 2024. Any motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee must include a certified copy of an inmate trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period beginning approximately April 25, 2024 through the date of the petition, October 25, 2024. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Raymond Saunders may have until November 18, 2024, to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. 2. If petitioner does not submit either the $5 payment or a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment before November 18, 2024, I will assume that petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition. 3. Petitioner’s motion to waive the filing is denied without prejudice. Entered this 25th day of October, 2024. BY THE COURT: /s/ ANDREW R. WISEMAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?