Franken v. Jewell

Filing 39

ORDER Transferring Action to the United States District of Wyoming signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/01/2016. (Flores, E) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/6/2016.]

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN FRANKEN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. SALLY JEWELL, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK; DAVID HALLAC, individually; and DOES 1-8, 17 Case No. 1:15-cv-01368-EPG ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF WYOMING (ECF No. 27) Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Kevin Franken initially filed a complaint on September 8, 2015. (ECF No. 1). 19 20 Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss that complaint on November 18, 2015. (ECF No. 11.) 21 Before briefing was completed on the motion, the parties agreed to allow the filing of a first 22 amended complaint.1 The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was then filed on January 12, 23 2016. (ECF No. 18.) The FAC alleges events arising out of Plaintiff’s employment at 24 Yellowstone National Park and the termination of that employment. The FAC includes claims 25 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a single claim for conversion under Wyoming state law. Plaintiff 26 currently resides in California and Defendant David Hallac currently resides in North Carolina. 27 1 28 Shortly thereafter, the parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in the case. (ECF Nos. 13, 14, 28, 29.) 1 1 On April 10, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC. (ECF No. 27.) 2 Among other things, Defendants asserted that venue in the Eastern District of California is 3 improper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendant 4 Hallac because he has no “minimum contacts” to California in conformance with California’s 5 long-arm statute. In his opposition, Plaintiff acknowledged that the case should be transferred to 6 the District of Wyoming and asked for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss came on for hearing on May 25, 2016 at 10:30 a.m. 7 8 Plaintiff Kevin Franken appeared telephonically through counsel Micah Fargey of Fargey Law 9 P.C. and Defendants appeared through counsel Bruce Emard of the U.S. Attorney’s Office. At 10 the hearing, the parties: (1) agreed that transfer to the District of Wyoming was appropriate; (2) 11 agreed that Plaintiff could receive leave to file a second amended complaint; and (3) asked that 12 the Court conduct a settlement conference to determine if the case could be settled before the 13 transfer was effected. The settlement conference was conducted on June 29, 2016. The case did 14 not settle. The parties’ request to transfer the case is thus before the Court. 15 Title 28 of the United States Code section 1391(b) provides: 16 19 A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. 20 The Court finds that, based on the allegations in the FAC, that a “substantial part of the 21 events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred” within the District of Wyoming and that 22 the District of Wyoming is a judicial district in which at least one of the Defendants may be 23 found. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), (3). The Court thus determines that it is appropriate to transfer 24 this case to the District of Wyoming. 17 18 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the United 26 States District Court for the District of Wyoming. 27 \\\ 28 \\\ 2 1 After transferring this case, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2016 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?