Franken v. Jewell
Filing
39
ORDER Transferring Action to the United States District of Wyoming signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 07/01/2016. (Flores, E) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/6/2016.]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KEVIN FRANKEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
v.
SALLY JEWELL, SECRETARY, U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR;
YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK;
DAVID HALLAC, individually; and
DOES 1-8,
17
Case No. 1:15-cv-01368-EPG
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION
TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT, DISTRICT OF WYOMING
(ECF No. 27)
Defendants.
18
Plaintiff Kevin Franken initially filed a complaint on September 8, 2015. (ECF No. 1).
19
20
Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss that complaint on November 18, 2015. (ECF No. 11.)
21
Before briefing was completed on the motion, the parties agreed to allow the filing of a first
22
amended complaint.1 The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was then filed on January 12,
23
2016. (ECF No. 18.) The FAC alleges events arising out of Plaintiff’s employment at
24
Yellowstone National Park and the termination of that employment. The FAC includes claims
25
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a single claim for conversion under Wyoming state law. Plaintiff
26
currently resides in California and Defendant David Hallac currently resides in North Carolina.
27
1
28
Shortly thereafter, the parties consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in the
case. (ECF Nos. 13, 14, 28, 29.)
1
1
On April 10, 2016, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC. (ECF No. 27.)
2
Among other things, Defendants asserted that venue in the Eastern District of California is
3
improper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendant
4
Hallac because he has no “minimum contacts” to California in conformance with California’s
5
long-arm statute. In his opposition, Plaintiff acknowledged that the case should be transferred to
6
the District of Wyoming and asked for leave to file a second amended complaint.
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss came on for hearing on May 25, 2016 at 10:30 a.m.
7
8
Plaintiff Kevin Franken appeared telephonically through counsel Micah Fargey of Fargey Law
9
P.C. and Defendants appeared through counsel Bruce Emard of the U.S. Attorney’s Office. At
10
the hearing, the parties: (1) agreed that transfer to the District of Wyoming was appropriate; (2)
11
agreed that Plaintiff could receive leave to file a second amended complaint; and (3) asked that
12
the Court conduct a settlement conference to determine if the case could be settled before the
13
transfer was effected. The settlement conference was conducted on June 29, 2016. The case did
14
not settle. The parties’ request to transfer the case is thus before the Court.
15
Title 28 of the United States Code section 1391(b) provides:
16
19
A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of citizenship
may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1) a judicial
district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2)
a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise
to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the
action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if
there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.
20
The Court finds that, based on the allegations in the FAC, that a “substantial part of the
21
events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred” within the District of Wyoming and that
22
the District of Wyoming is a judicial district in which at least one of the Defendants may be
23
found. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2), (3). The Court thus determines that it is appropriate to transfer
24
this case to the District of Wyoming.
17
18
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is TRANSFERRED to the United
26
States District Court for the District of Wyoming.
27
\\\
28
\\\
2
1
After transferring this case, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 1, 2016
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?