Cases 1 - 10 of 239,362
Freeman v. NYC Health + Hospitals et al
as 1:2024cv03678
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
(PC) Bennett v. Parales et al
as 1:2024cv00591
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schulz v. Caliber Fitness Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Schulz
Defendant:
Caliber Fitness Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Heuerman v. Rinse Repeat Ventures Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey P Heuerman
Defendant:
Rinse Repeat Ventures Incorporated and Randy Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Nevarez v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Robert Nevarez, Sr.
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, Tempe, City of, Peter Klepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lindsey #333281 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01150
Petitioner:
Jason Christopher Lindsey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mola #365547 v. Ramirez
as 3:2024cv08096
Plaintiff:
John Mola
Defendant:
Hecter Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
