Cases 1 - 10 of 439,152
Freeman v. NYC Health + Hospitals et al
as 1:2024cv03678
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Archa v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Archa
Defendant:
The State of New York, NYS Department of Correctional Services The Warden of Auburn Correctional Facility, Correction Officer Giboo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lehey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Lehey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
Toby Edward Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Vanguard Construction & Development Co., Inc. v. Colony Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv03818
Plaintiff:
Vanguard Construction & Development Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Colony Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 in Diversity-Insurance Contract
DAVID A. BIRDSELL v. THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2024cv03817
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. BIRDSELL
Defendant:
The Euclid Chemical Company, RPM International Inc., Compagnie De Saint-Gobain S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03759
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03815
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
