District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 112,105
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. DAVID et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
JASON MIDDLETON
Defendant:
DAVID and MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brownlee v. South Bend Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jesse Brownlee
Defendant:
South Bend Police Department and St Joseph County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Wilkins et al v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
as 3:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Deborah Wilkins and Norman C. Wilkins
Defendant:
Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hogan v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Hogan
Defendant:
Sherrif Hershberger and Pgs - 1 to 9 Names of Staff Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
