District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 112,105
Schnuckel v. Social Security
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Schnuckel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC v. CITY OF CARMEL
as 1:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
BARHAM INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF CARMEL
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945 Compensation for Land Condemnation
HEMAK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07102
Plaintiff:
DEBRA HEMAK
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAMSHAFT CAPITAL FUND, LP et al v. BYJU'S ALPHA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00733
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinsey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Tony P Kinsey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. RentGrow, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dominique Williams
Defendant:
RentGrow, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WHEAT et al v. MENARD INC.
as 1:2024cv00811
Plaintiff:
GLEN WHEAT and LINDA WHEAT
Defendant:
MENARD INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
