NM Dept. of Game and Fish v. DOI, et al

Filing

[10462025] Reversed/Vacated and Remanded; Terminated on the merits after oral hearing; Written, signed, published; Judges Holmes, Matheson (concurring) and McHugh (authoring). Mandate to issue. --[Edited 04/25/2017 by GH to replace PDF originally attached to entry with updated PDF containing Judge Matheson's concurrence]. [16-2189, 16-2202]

Download PDF
Appellate Case: 16-2189 Document: 01019799808 Date Filed: 04/25/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT OFFICE OF THE CLERK Byron White United States Courthouse 1823 Stout Street Denver, Colorado 80257 (303) 844-3157 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court April 25, 2017 Ms. McCrystie Adams Defenders of Wildlife 535 16th Street, Suite 310 Denver, CO 80202 Ms. Judith Bella Calman New Mexico Wilderness Alliance 142 Truman Street, NE, Suite B-1 Albuquerque, NM 87108 Ms. Karen Grohman Office of the United States Attorney District of New Mexico P.O. Box 607 Albuquerque, NM 87103 Ms. Rachel Heron United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division P.O. Box 7415 L'Enfant Plaza Station Washington, DC 20044 Ms. Bridget Kennedy McNeil United States Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division 999 18th Street South Terrace, Suite 370 Denver, CO 80202 Chris Wolpert Chief Deputy Clerk Appellate Case: 16-2189 Document: 01019799808 Date Filed: 04/25/2017 Page: 2 Mr. Andrew A Smith U.S. Department of Justice ENRD c/o U.S. Attorneys Office P.O. Box 607 Albuquerque, NM 87103 Mr. Clifford E. Stevens United States Department of Justice Environmental and Natural Resources Division 601 D Street, NW, Room 3607 Washington, DC 20004 Mr. James Jay Tutchton WildEarth Guardians 6439 East Maplewood Avenue Centennial, CO 80111 RE: 16-2189, 16-2202, NM Dept. of Game and Fish v. DOI, et al Dist/Ag docket: 1:16-CV-00462-WJ-KBM Dear Counsel: Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of the court issued today in this matter. The court has entered judgment on the docket pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 36. Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 40, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 14 days after entry of judgment. Please note, however, that if the appeal is a civil case in which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 45 days after entry of judgment. Parties should consult both the Federal Rules and local rules of this court with regard to applicable standards and requirements. In particular, petitions for rehearing may not exceed 15 pages in length, and no answer is permitted unless the court enters an order requiring a response. If requesting rehearing en banc, the requesting party must file 6 paper copies with the clerk, in addition to satisfying all Electronic Case Filing requirements. See Fed. R. App. P. Rules 35 and 40, and 10th Cir. R. 35 and 40 for further information governing petitions for rehearing. 2 Appellate Case: 16-2189 Document: 01019799808 Date Filed: 04/25/2017 Please contact this office if you have questions. Sincerely, Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of the Court cc: Carol Bambery Andrew L. Brasher Mark Brnovich Douglas Scott Burdin Martin Bourne Bushman Tommy Hauck Butler David Todd Bydalek Kristina Caffrey Judith Bella Calman Gina Marie Cannan Charles Edwin Chamberlin Jeffrey A. Chanay Dennis David DeWald P. Clayton Eubanks Katherine Ferlic Joseph A. Foster Timothy C. Fox Tyler R. Green Kent Holsinger M. Reed Hopper Marty Jackley John I. Kittel Justin D Lavene Adam Paul Laxalt Steven J. Lechner Jahna M. Lindemuth Charles David McGuigan James Odenkirk Ken Paxton Douglas Joseph Peterson Ashley Remillard Lisa Reynolds Benjamin Zachary Rubin 3 Page: 3 Appellate Case: 16-2189 Document: 01019799808 Leslie Rutledge Matthias L. Sayer Brad D. Schimel Derek Schmidt Bill Schuette Anna Seidman Lawrence G. Wasden Paul S. Weiland EAS/na 4 Date Filed: 04/25/2017 Page: 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?