NM Dept. of Game and Fish v. DOI, et al
Filing
[10462025] Reversed/Vacated and Remanded; Terminated on the merits after oral hearing; Written, signed, published; Judges Holmes, Matheson (concurring) and McHugh (authoring). Mandate to issue. --[Edited 04/25/2017 by GH to replace PDF originally attached to entry with updated PDF containing Judge Matheson's concurrence]. [16-2189, 16-2202]
Appellate Case: 16-2189
Document: 01019799808
Date Filed: 04/25/2017
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
Byron White United States Courthouse
1823 Stout Street
Denver, Colorado 80257
(303) 844-3157
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
April 25, 2017
Ms. McCrystie Adams
Defenders of Wildlife
535 16th Street, Suite 310
Denver, CO 80202
Ms. Judith Bella Calman
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance
142 Truman Street, NE, Suite B-1
Albuquerque, NM 87108
Ms. Karen Grohman
Office of the United States Attorney
District of New Mexico
P.O. Box 607
Albuquerque, NM 87103
Ms. Rachel Heron
United States Department of Justice
Environment & Natural Resources Division
P.O. Box 7415
L'Enfant Plaza Station
Washington, DC 20044
Ms. Bridget Kennedy McNeil
United States Department of Justice
Environment and Natural Resources Division
999 18th Street
South Terrace, Suite 370
Denver, CO 80202
Chris Wolpert
Chief Deputy Clerk
Appellate Case: 16-2189
Document: 01019799808
Date Filed: 04/25/2017
Page: 2
Mr. Andrew A Smith
U.S. Department of Justice
ENRD
c/o U.S. Attorneys Office
P.O. Box 607
Albuquerque, NM 87103
Mr. Clifford E. Stevens
United States Department of Justice
Environmental and Natural Resources Division
601 D Street, NW, Room 3607
Washington, DC 20004
Mr. James Jay Tutchton
WildEarth Guardians
6439 East Maplewood Avenue
Centennial, CO 80111
RE:
16-2189, 16-2202, NM Dept. of Game and Fish v. DOI, et al
Dist/Ag docket: 1:16-CV-00462-WJ-KBM
Dear Counsel:
Enclosed is a copy of the opinion of the court issued today in this matter. The court has
entered judgment on the docket pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 36.
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. Rule 40, any petition for rehearing must be filed within 14
days after entry of judgment. Please note, however, that if the appeal is a civil case in
which the United States or its officer or agency is a party, any petition for rehearing must
be filed within 45 days after entry of judgment. Parties should consult both the Federal
Rules and local rules of this court with regard to applicable standards and requirements.
In particular, petitions for rehearing may not exceed 15 pages in length, and no answer is
permitted unless the court enters an order requiring a response. If requesting rehearing en
banc, the requesting party must file 6 paper copies with the clerk, in addition to satisfying
all Electronic Case Filing requirements. See Fed. R. App. P. Rules 35 and 40, and 10th
Cir. R. 35 and 40 for further information governing petitions for rehearing.
2
Appellate Case: 16-2189
Document: 01019799808
Date Filed: 04/25/2017
Please contact this office if you have questions.
Sincerely,
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of the Court
cc:
Carol Bambery
Andrew L. Brasher
Mark Brnovich
Douglas Scott Burdin
Martin Bourne Bushman
Tommy Hauck Butler
David Todd Bydalek
Kristina Caffrey
Judith Bella Calman
Gina Marie Cannan
Charles Edwin Chamberlin
Jeffrey A. Chanay
Dennis David DeWald
P. Clayton Eubanks
Katherine Ferlic
Joseph A. Foster
Timothy C. Fox
Tyler R. Green
Kent Holsinger
M. Reed Hopper
Marty Jackley
John I. Kittel
Justin D Lavene
Adam Paul Laxalt
Steven J. Lechner
Jahna M. Lindemuth
Charles David McGuigan
James Odenkirk
Ken Paxton
Douglas Joseph Peterson
Ashley Remillard
Lisa Reynolds
Benjamin Zachary Rubin
3
Page: 3
Appellate Case: 16-2189
Document: 01019799808
Leslie Rutledge
Matthias L. Sayer
Brad D. Schimel
Derek Schmidt
Bill Schuette
Anna Seidman
Lawrence G. Wasden
Paul S. Weiland
EAS/na
4
Date Filed: 04/25/2017
Page: 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?