USA v. David Arvelo

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant David Michael Arvelo. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Chet Kaufman is GRANTED. [7162579-2], Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Chet Kaufman is GRANTED. [7159480-2]. (10/07/14 opinion)(FMH/ SM/JCH)

Case: 14-10315

Date Filed: 10/07/2014

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10315
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00025-MW-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID MICHAEL ARVELO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(October 7, 2014)

Case: 14-10315

Date Filed: 10/07/2014

Page: 2 of 2

Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for David Michael Arvelo, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Arvelo’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.

2