Kevin Barker, et al v. Capital One Bank, et al

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Kevin S. Barker, et al. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 14-14875

Date Filed: 11/19/2015

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14875
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-md-02171-TWT
KEVIN S. BARKER,
ERIC W. BAXTER,
MICHAEL A. GAFFNEY,
REBEKAH L. KAUTZ,
RICHARD J. LAVALLIE,
DAVID E. SOLSBERRY,
NANCY MANCUSO,
TRACI L. ROBERTI,
JENNIFER L. KOLKOWSKI,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,
Defendant - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(November 19, 2015)

Case: 14-14875

Date Filed: 11/19/2015

Page: 2 of 2

Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and MARTINEZ,∗ District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Barker and eight other Capital One customers appeal the district
court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Capital One Bank (USA),
N.A. on numerous claims. Customers allege that Capital One unlawfully
increased their credit card interest rates in violation of both federal and state law.
After a review of the parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral
argument, we affirm substantially for reasons given by the well-reasoned opinion
of the district court. In re Capital One Bank Credit Card Interest Rate Litigation,
51 F. Supp. 3d 1316 (N.D. Ga. 2014).
AFFIRMED.

∗

Honorable Jose E. Martinez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of
Florida, sitting by designation.
2