USA v. Vincent Hudson

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Vincent Hudson. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 14-15480

Date Filed: 12/07/2015

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15480
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00078-PGB-TBS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VINCENT HUDSON,
a.k.a. Goldie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 7, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-15480

Date Filed: 12/07/2015

Page: 2 of 2

Thomas Dale, appointed appellate counsel for Vincent Hudson, has filed a
motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Hudson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2