Summit Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Summit Contractors, Inc.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 15-11051

Date Filed: 03/07/2016

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-11051
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-00295-EAK-TGW
SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
CRUM & FORSTER SPECIALITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(March 7, 2016)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO,* District
Judge.
__________________
∗

Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Case: 15-11051

Date Filed: 03/07/2016

Page: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Summit Contractors, Inc. (“Summit”) appeals summary judgment granted to
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company (“Crum & Forster”) in its action
under a general liability insurance policy seeking a determination of the
applicability of the Self-Insured Retention Endorsement in the policy issued by
Crum & Forster. After studying the briefs, reviewing the record, and hearing oral
argument in this case, we affirm the judgment of the district court granting
summary judgment to Crum & Forster and denying summary judgment to Summit
for the reasons set forth in its Order, dated February 12, 2015.
AFFIRMED.

2