USA v. Jonathan Prive


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Jonathan Tyler Prive. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Daniel N. Brodersen is GRANTED. [7544581-2]; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Jonathan Tyler Prive is DENIED. [7671511-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link

Download PDF
Case: 15-12032 Date Filed: 05/24/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-12032 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00033-JA-KRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN TYLER PRIVE, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (May 24, 2016) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-12032 Date Filed: 05/24/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Daniel Brodersen, appointed counsel for Jonathan Prive in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prive’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Additionally, Prive’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?