USA v. Jonathan Prive

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Jonathan Tyler Prive. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Daniel N. Brodersen is GRANTED. [7544581-2]; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Jonathan Tyler Prive is DENIED. [7671511-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 15-12032

Date Filed: 05/24/2016

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12032
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00033-JA-KRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN TYLER PRIVE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 24, 2016)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 15-12032

Date Filed: 05/24/2016

Page: 2 of 2

Daniel Brodersen, appointed counsel for Jonathan Prive in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prive’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED. Additionally, Prive’s motion for appointment of new
counsel is DENIED.

2