USA v. Jonathan Prive
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Jonathan Tyler Prive. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Daniel N. Brodersen is GRANTED. [7544581-2]; Motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Jonathan Tyler Prive is DENIED. [7671511-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 15-12032
Date Filed: 05/24/2016
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-12032
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00033-JA-KRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN TYLER PRIVE,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(May 24, 2016)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-12032
Date Filed: 05/24/2016
Page: 2 of 2
Daniel Brodersen, appointed counsel for Jonathan Prive in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prive’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED. Additionally, Prive’s motion for appointment of new
counsel is DENIED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?