Natasha Golden, et al v. FNF Servicing, Inc.
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellants Natasha Golden and Joy R. Webster. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 15-14513
Date Filed: 05/23/2016
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-14513
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-00033-WLS
JAMES L. KERFOOT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
JOY R. WEBSTER,
as Trustee in Bankruptcy for James and Sylvia Kerfoot,
NATASHA GOLDEN,
as Administratrix of the Estate of Sylvia F. Kerfoot,
NATASHA GOLDEN,
personal representative and administratrix of the Estate
of James L. Kerfoot,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
versus
FNF SERVICING, INC.,
a foreign corporation,
d.b.a. Loan Care Serving Center, Inc.,
Defendant-Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(May 23, 2016)
Case: 15-14513
Date Filed: 05/23/2016
Page: 2 of 2
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and ROGERS,* Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgment the district court granted defendant
on the three claims of their amended complaint: Count One, alleging a violation of
the Georgia RICO statute, O.C.G.A. § 16-14-1 et seq., Count Two, alleging a
common law tort claim, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Count
Three, alleging violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, 12 U.S.C.
§ 2605(e). Having heard oral argument from counsel for the parties and
considered their briefs, we conclude for the reasons stated by the district court in
its dispositive order of September 10, 2015, Doc. 122, that the district court
properly granted defendant summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
____________
*Honorable John M. Rogers, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by
designation.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?