USA v. Leon Woods, Jr.
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Leon Woods, Jr.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 15-14802
Date Filed: 05/16/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-14802
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20462-KMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LEON WOODS, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(May 16, 2017)
Before MARTIN, ANDERSON, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
Case: 15-14802
Date Filed: 05/16/2017
Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Leon Woods, Jr. appeals his 105-month sentence, imposed after pleading
guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 922(g)(1).
The district court correctly concluded that Woods’s Florida
manslaughter conviction was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)’s
residual clause because this Court’s prior precedent establishes the residual
clause’s constitutional validity and categorically qualifies Florida manslaughter as
a crime of violence. For background, see United States v. Matchett, 802 F.3d 1185
(11th Cir. 2015); In re Burgest, 829 F.3d 1285 (11th Cir. 2016). In addition, even
if the district court committed error, the error was harmless, as the district court
stated that it would impose the 105-month sentence as a reasonable sentence,
regardless of any Sentencing Guideline calculation; and the sentence was, in fact,
reasonable. For background, see United States v. Keene, 470 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir.
2006).
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?