Brian Sidman v. Joseph Dougherty

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Joseph P. Dougherty. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 15-15000

Date Filed: 10/03/2017

Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-15000
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-24594-MGC

In Re: MRS. PATRICIA DOUGHERTY,
BRIAN A. SIDMAN,
an individual,
Plaintiff-Counter
Defendant-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH P. DOUGHERTY,
11106 Crescent Bay Blvd.
Clermont, FL 34711
352-988-3507
an individual,
Defendant-Third Party
Plaintiff-Counter
Claimant-Appellant,

Case: 15-15000

Date Filed: 10/03/2017

Page: 2 of 3

DOMAINS BY PROXY LLC,
a Delaware corporation, et al.,
Defendants,
LOUIS ROGERS
10900 Nuckols Road
Suite 200
Glen Allen, VA 23060
804-290-7900, et al.,
Third Party Defendants.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 3, 2017)
Before HULL, JORDAN, and BOGGS, * Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, and with the
benefit of oral argument, this Court finds no reversible error in the district court’s
October 6, 2015 order denying Appellant Joseph P. Dougherty’s request for costs
and attorney’s fees or in the district court’s April 19, 2016 order denying Appellant

*

Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by
designation.
2

Case: 15-15000

Date Filed: 10/03/2017

Page: 3 of 3

Dougherty’s motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm both of the
district court’s orders.
AFFIRMED.

3