USA v. Thomas Lundy

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Thomas Jerome Lundy. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Richard Michael Summa is GRANTED. [7714187-2]. (See 08/31/2016 opinion)(CRW/RSR/SHB) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 16-10140

Date Filed: 08/31/2016

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10140
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
THOMAS JEROME LUNDY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(August 31, 2016)
Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-10140

Date Filed: 08/31/2016

Page: 2 of 2

Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.
1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy’s conviction and
sentence is AFFIRMED.

2