USA v. Thomas Lundy


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Thomas Jerome Lundy. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Richard Michael Summa is GRANTED. [7714187-2]. (See 08/31/2016 opinion)(CRW/RSR/SHB) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link

Download PDF
Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-10140 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:02-cr-00043-MP-GRJ-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JEROME LUNDY, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________ (August 31, 2016) Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 16-10140 Date Filed: 08/31/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Richard M. Summa, appointed counsel for Thomas Jerome Lundy in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lundy’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?