USA v. Ian Bowens

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Ian M. Bowens. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Jonathan Dodson is GRANTED. [7932777-2]. (See 03/17/2017 opinion)(WHP/AJ/RSR)The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 16-10228

Date Filed: 03/17/2017

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10228
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00014-WLS-TQL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
IAN M. BOWENS,
a.k.a. New Man,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(March 17, 2017)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Dodson, appointed counsel for Ian Bowens in this direct criminal

Case: 16-10228

Date Filed: 03/17/2017

Page: 2 of 2

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel 's motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bowens's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

2