USA v. Joshua Clark

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Joshua Curtis Clark. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by William Gregory Hughes is GRANTED. [7823229-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Case: 16-11543

Date Filed: 01/17/2017

Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-11543
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00215-CG-B-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSHUA CURTIS CLARK,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(January 17, 2017)
Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 16-11543

Date Filed: 01/17/2017

Page: 2 of 2

William Hughes, appointed counsel for Joshua Clark in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Clark’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2