USA v. Darius Brightwell
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Darius Santas Brightwell. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Daniel Seckinger Woodrum is GRANTED. [7923902-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions (Opinion corrected on 2/27/2017 - incorrect district court number.)--[Edited 02/27/2017 by JRP]
Case: 16-13045
Date Filed: 02/27/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-13045
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:15-cr-00010-CAR-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DARIUS BRIGHTWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(February 27, 2017)
Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel S. Woodrum, appointed counsel for Darius Brightwell, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
Case: 16-13045
Date Filed: 02/27/2017
Page: 2 of 2
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and
Brightwell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?