USA v. Darius Brightwell


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Darius Santas Brightwell. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Daniel Seckinger Woodrum is GRANTED. [7923902-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link (Opinion corrected on 2/27/2017 - incorrect district court number.)--[Edited 02/27/2017 by JRP]

Download PDF
Case: 16-13045 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-13045 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:15-cr-00010-CAR-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DARIUS BRIGHTWELL, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia ________________________ (February 27, 2017) Before MARTIN, ANDERSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Daniel S. Woodrum, appointed counsel for Darius Brightwell, in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a Case: 16-13045 Date Filed: 02/27/2017 Page: 2 of 2 brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brightwell’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?