USA v. James Carl Williams

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant James Carl Doron Williams. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Aaron S. Baghdadi is GRANTED. [7943179-2]. (See 04/19/2017 opinion)(FMH/CRW/RLA) Williams motions for appointment of counsel and relief are DENIED as moot. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.--[Edited 04/19/2017 by DC]

Download PDF
Case: 16-13210 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-13210 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00227-GAP-GJK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES CARL DORON WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (April 19, 2017) Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Aaron Baghdadi, appointed counsel for James Williams in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 16-13210 Date Filed: 04/19/2017 Page: 2 of 2 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because we have concluded that no arguable issues of merit exist, Williams’s motions for appointment of new counsel and relief under Fed. R. App. P. 31 are DENIED as moot. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?