USA v. James Carl Williams
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant James Carl Doron Williams. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Aaron S. Baghdadi is GRANTED. [7943179-2]. (See 04/19/2017 opinion)(FMH/CRW/RLA) Williams motions for appointment of counsel and relief are DENIED as moot. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.--[Edited 04/19/2017 by DC]
Case: 16-13210
Date Filed: 04/19/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-13210
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:15-cr-00227-GAP-GJK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES CARL DORON WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(April 19, 2017)
Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Baghdadi, appointed counsel for James Williams in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 16-13210
Date Filed: 04/19/2017
Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Williams’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Because
we have concluded that no arguable issues of merit exist, Williams’s motions for
appointment of new counsel and relief under Fed. R. App. P. 31 are DENIED as
moot.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?