USA v. Neil Puterbaugh, Jr.
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Neil R. Puterbaugh, Jr.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum is GRANTED. [8025722-2], Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum is GRANTED. [8022971-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 16-14904
Date Filed: 05/22/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-14904
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:14-cr-80227-DMM-27
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
NEIL R. PUTERBAUGH, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(May 22, 2017)
Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Neil Puterbaugh, Jr. in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 16-14904
Date Filed: 05/22/2017
Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Puterbaugh’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?