USA v. Neil Puterbaugh, Jr.

Filing

Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Neil R. Puterbaugh, Jr.. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum is GRANTED. [8025722-2], Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Richard Lawrence Rosenbaum is GRANTED. [8022971-2]. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Download PDF
Case: 16-14904 Date Filed: 05/22/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-14904 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:14-cr-80227-DMM-27 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NEIL R. PUTERBAUGH, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (May 22, 2017) Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Richard Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Neil Puterbaugh, Jr. in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the Case: 16-14904 Date Filed: 05/22/2017 Page: 2 of 2 appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Puterbaugh’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?