DeAngelo Cook v. Warden, Macon SP
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant DeAngelo Cook. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 16-15311
Date Filed: 04/28/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-15311
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-01406-RWS
DEANGELO COOK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WARDEN, MACON SP,
Respondent - Appellee.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(April 28, 2017)
Before HULL, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-15311
Date Filed: 04/28/2017
Page: 2 of 2
In 2009, De Angelo Cook, a Georgia prisoner, filed a federal habeas corpus
petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That petition was dismissed with prejudice
as untimely, and Mr. Cook did not appeal.
In 2016, Mr. Cook filed a second habeas corpus petition. The district court
dismissed this petition for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction because Mr. Cook had
not obtained circuit authorization to file a second or successive petition. Mr. Cook
now appeals.
We affirm. Because Mr. Cook did not obtain circuit authorization to file a
second or successive habeas petition, the district court did not have jurisdiction.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), (b) (4); Tompkins v. Secretary, 557 F.3d 1257,
1259 (11th Cir. 2009) .
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?