USA v. Cero Cajado
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Cero Castro Cajado. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. Motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mark J. O'Brien is GRANTED. [8092008-2]. (See 10/30/2017 opinion)(GBT/JEC/JP) The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 16-17188
Date Filed: 10/30/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-17188
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:16-cr-00152-MSS-JSS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CERO CASTRO CAJADO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(October 30, 2017)
Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 16-17188
Date Filed: 10/30/2017
Page: 2 of 2
Mark O’Brien, appointed counsel for Cero Cajado in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of Cajado’s appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cajado’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?