Dwight Jordan v. The City of Darien, et al


Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Dwight E. Jordan. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.

Download PDF
Case: 16-17721 Date Filed: 09/28/2017 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 16-17721 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cv-00049-LGW-RSB DWIGHT E. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus THE CITY OF DARIEN, BONITA CALDWELL, CHIEF DONNIE HOWARD, NICHOLAS ROUNTREE, Officers of the City of Darien Police Department, OFFICER ANTHONY BROWN, Officers of the City of Darien Police Department, ARCHIE DAVIS. Defendants-Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ________________________ (September 28, 2017) Case: 16-17721 Date Filed: 09/28/2017 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFLAT and JORDAN, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,* District Judge. PER CURIAM: This lawsuit arose in the aftermath of a disturbance at a school board meeting and involved First and Fourth Amendment claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and the Georgia Open Meetings Act, O.C.G.A. §§ 50-141–50-14-6. The plaintiff appeals the District Court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendants. After considering the parties briefs and with the benefit of oral argument in Atlanta, we conclude that the summary judgment should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. ____________________ *Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?