USA v. Jacquel Searles
Filing
Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Jacquel Searles. Decision: Affirmed. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. The opinion is also available through the Court's Opinions page at this link http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions.
Case: 17-11945
Date Filed: 10/19/2017
Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 17-11945
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:16-cr-00267-WTM-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JACQUEL SEARLES,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 19, 2017)
Before WLLIAM PRYOR, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jacquel Searles appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a
convicted felon. 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), 924(e). Searles argues that his
Case: 17-11945
Date Filed: 10/19/2017
Page: 2 of 2
trial counsel was ineffective for misadvising him that his prior convictions for
burglary would not be used to enhance his sentence under the Armed Career
Criminal Act. See id. § 924(e). Because the district court did not have an
opportunity to consider this argument and develop a record regarding trial
counsel’s performance, we decline to consider Searles’s argument for the first time
on direct appeal. See United States v. Puentes-Hurtado, 794 F.3d 1278, 1285 (11th
Cir. 2015). Searles can raise his argument in a postconviction motion. See 28
U.S.C. § 2255.
We AFFIRM Searles’s conviction.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?