Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.
Filing
456
ARGUMENT NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED.[390720] [10-3270]
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DENNIS JACOBS
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CHIEF JUDGE
CLERK OF COURT
Date: September 14, 2011
DC Docket #: 07−cv−2103
Docket #: 10−3270 cv
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
Short Title: Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.
DC Judge: Stanton
NOTICE TO THE BAR
Offsite Video Argument. At this time the Court does not provide offsite video argument.
Recording of Argument.
A CD of an argument may be purchased for $26 per CD by written request to the Clerk. The request should include the case
name, the docket number and the date or oral argument. CDs will be delivered by first class mail unless the request instructs to
hold for pick−up or requests Federal Express Service, in which case a Federal Express account number and envelope must be
provided.
Court Reporters.
Parties may arrange − at their own expense − for an official court reporter to transcribe argument from a copy of the hearing
tape or to attend and transcribe the hearing directly. A party must first obtain written consent from opposing counsel − or
move the Court for permission − to have the court reporter attend and transcribe the hearing and must provide the calendar
clerk written notice, including the name, address and telephone number of the attending reporter and, if applicable, the
reporting firm at least one week prior to the hearing date.
An original and three (3) copies of the transcript must be submitted to the Clerk for approval by the panel that heard the case;
transcripts will not be officially filed until approved.
Interpreter Services for the Hearing Impaired.
Counsel requiring sign interpreters or other hearing aids must submit a written notice to the Calendar Team at least one week
before oral argument. Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to .
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?