Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.

Filing 94

MOTION TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF, on behalf of Non-Party Filer(s), FILED. Service date12/10/2010 by CM/ECF.[164856] [10-3270]

Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.

Doc. 94

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: [phone]
MOTION INFORMATION STATEMENT Docket Number(s): Motion for:

10-3270

Caption [use short title]

Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief

Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.

Set forth below precise, complete statement of relief sought:

Vobile, Inc. respectfully requests leave to file an amicus brief, providing the Court with information regarding currently available and widspread commercial use of technology for identifing infringing digital video content.
MOVING PARTY: Vobile, Inc. 9 Plaintiff 9 Appellant/Petitioner MOVING ATTORNEY: OPPOSING PARTY: 9 Defendant 9 Appellee/Respondent

See attached rider.

Stephen M. Wurzburg

OPPOSING ATTORNEY: See attached rider. [name of attorney, with firm, address, phone number and e-mail]

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 2475 Hanover Street Palo Alto, CA 94304 [phone]; [e-mail]
Court-Judge/Agency appealed from: Please check appropriate boxes: Has movant notified opposing counsel (required by Local Rule 27.1): 9 Yes 9 No (explain): Opposing counsel's position on motion: 9 Unopposed 9 Opposed 9 Don't Know Does opposing counsel intend to file a response: 9 Yes 9 No 9 Don't Know Is oral argument on motion requested? Has argument date of appeal been set? 9 Yes
9 No (requests for oral argument will not necessarily be granted)

The Hon. Louis L. Stanton, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
FOR EMERGENCY MOTIONS, MOTIONS FOR STAYS AND INJUNCTIONS PENDING APPEAL: Has request for relief been made below? 9 Yes 9 No Has this relief been previously sought in this Court? 9 Yes 9 No Requested return date and explanation of emergency:

9 Yes No If yes, enter date:__________________________________________________________ 9
9 Yes

Signature of Moving Attorney: 12/10/2010 ___________________________________Date: ___________________

Has service been effected?

9 No [Attach proof of service]

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion is GRANTED DENIED. FOR THE COURT: CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE, Clerk of Court Date: _____________________________________________ By: ________________________________________________

Form T-1080

Dockets.Justia.com

Vobile, Inc. Rider to Form T-1080

OPPOSING PARTIES: YouTube, Inc., YouTube LLC and Google Inc.

OPPOSING ATTORNEYS: Andrew H. Schapiro Mayer Brown LLP 1675 Broadway New York, New York 10019 [phone] [e-mail] David H. Kramer Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 [phone] [e-mail]