Nielsen v. AECOM Technology Corporation

Filing

OPINION, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, by RDS, PWH, DAL, FILED.[1290260] [13-235]

Case: 13-235

Document: 87-4

Page: 1

08/08/2014

1290260

1

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
ROBERT A. KATZMANN

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE

CHIEF JUDGE

CLERK OF COURT

Date: August 08, 2014
Docket #: 13-235cv
Short Title: Nielsen v. AECOM Technology
Corporation

DC Docket #: 12-cv-5163
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Forrest

VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS
Counsel for
_________________________________________________________________________
respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to
prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the
________________________________________________________________
and in favor of
_________________________________________________________________________
for insertion in the mandate.
Docketing Fee

_____________________

Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________
Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________
Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________

(VERIFICATION HERE)
________________________
Signature