In re: In Re: Fairfield Sentry Limit

Filing

OPINION, the district court's 07/03/2013 order affirming the bankruptcy court's order denying Krys's application for section 363 review is vacated and remanded to the district court with instructions to remand to the bankruptcy court for such review, by JON, JMW, JAC, FILED.[1329751] [13-3000]

Case: 13-3000

Document: 88-2

Page: 1

09/26/2014

1329751

1

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
ROBERT A. KATZMANN

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE

CHIEF JUDGE

CLERK OF COURT

Date: September 26, 2014
Docket #: 13-3000bk
Short Title: In re: In Re: Fairfield Sentry Limit

DC Docket #: 13-cv-1524
DC Court: SDNY (NEW YORK CITY)
DC Judge: Hellerstein

NOTICE OF DECISION

The court has issued a decision in the above-entitled case. It is available on the Court's website
http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov.
Judgment was entered on September 26, 2014; and a mandate will later issue in accordance with
FRAP 41.
If pursuant to FRAP Rule 39 (c) you are required to file an itemized and verified bill of costs you
must do so, with proof of service, within 14 days after entry of judgment. The form, with
instructions, is also available on Court's website.

Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8560.