United States of America v. Schlegel (Brooks)

Filing

OPINION, affirming in part and vacating in part the judgment of the district court, by RKW, CFD, A. Donnelly, FILED.[2128977] [13-3213, 13-4288, 14-2577, 14-2682, 15-1156, 15-2058]--[Edited 09/20/2017 by HT]

Download PDF
Case 13-3213, Document 667-3, 09/20/2017, 2128977, Page1 of 2 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 ROBERT A. KATZMANN CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT Date: September 20, 2017 Docket #: 13-3213cr Short Title: United States of America v. Schlegel (Brooks) DC Docket #: 2:06-cr-550-3 DC Court: EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP)DC Docket #: 2:06-cr-5503 DC Court: EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP)DC Docket #: 2:06-cr-5503 DC Court: EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP)DC Docket #: 2:14-mc209-3 DC Court: EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP)DC Docket #: 2:06-cr-5503 DC Court: EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP)DC Docket #: 2:06-cr-5503 DC Court: EDNY (CENTRAL ISLIP) DC Judge: Seybert DC Judge: Spatt VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS Counsel for _________________________________________________________________________ respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the ________________________________________________________________ and in favor of _________________________________________________________________________ for insertion in the mandate. Case 13-3213, Document 667-3, 09/20/2017, 2128977, Page2 of 2 Docketing Fee _____________________ Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________ Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________ Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________ (VERIFICATION HERE) ________________________ Signature

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?