Aaron Boring, et al v. Google Inc
Filing
309606811
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Aaron C. Boring and Christine Boring. (ARL)
<![CDATA[
Case 2:08-cv-00694-ARH
Document 43
Filed 02/17/2009
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AARON C. BORING; CHRISTINE BORING, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No. 08-694 Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay
ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Google's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc.22) is GRANTED and the above-entitled action is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the Plaintiffs desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.
/s/ Amy Reynolds Hay United States Magistrate Judge
cc: Counsel of Record via CM-ECF
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
