USA v. Leonides Chapa

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20259 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: LHS , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 05/19/2014 for Appellant Leonides Chapa; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Cynthia Jean-Marie Cline, Esq. [7499661-2] [13-20259]

Download PDF
Case: 13-20259 Document: 00512609488 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 13-20259 Summary Calendar FILED April 28, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LEONIDES CHAPA, also known as Leonides Vela Chapa, also known as Leon Bella Chapa, also known as Leonides Bela Chapa, also known as Jaime Chapa, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-715-1 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Leonides Chapa has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Chapa has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Chapa’s response. We concur Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-20259 Document: 00512609488 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2014 No. 13-20259 with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?