USA v. Leonides Chapa
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20259 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: LHS , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 05/19/2014 for Appellant Leonides Chapa; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Cynthia Jean-Marie Cline, Esq. [7499661-2] [13-20259]
Case: 13-20259
Document: 00512609488
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/28/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 13-20259
Summary Calendar
FILED
April 28, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LEONIDES CHAPA, also known as Leonides Vela Chapa, also known as Leon
Bella Chapa, also known as Leonides Bela Chapa, also known as Jaime Chapa,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-715-1
Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Leonides Chapa has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Chapa has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Chapa’s response. We concur
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-20259
Document: 00512609488
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/28/2014
No. 13-20259
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for
appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?