USA v. Jose Claros-Argueta

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20597 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EBC , Judge: ECP , Judge: JWE Mandate pull date is 09/19/2014 for Appellant Jose Marvin Claros-Argueta; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Laura Fletcher Leavitt [7575318-2] [13-20597]

Download PDF
Case: 13-20597 Document: 00512750908 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-20597 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 29, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. JOSE MARVIN CLAROS-ARGUETA, also known as Jose M. Cloro, also known as Martin Argueta, also known as Jose Marvin Claros Argueta, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-751-1 Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Marvin ClarosArgueta has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Claros-Argueta has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-20597 Document: 00512750908 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014 No. 13-20597 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?