Donald Jones v. Houston Indep School District, et al
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20761 Affirmed ] Judge: TMR , Judge: EHJ , Judge: ECP Mandate pull date is 07/31/2014 [13-20761]
Case: 13-20761
Document: 00512693824
Page: 1
Date Filed: 07/10/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
No. 13-20761
Summary Calendar
FILED
July 10, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
DONALD A. JONES,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
also known as Houston Independent School District Board of Education; DANA
DARDEN,
Defendants-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CV-920
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons explained
in detail by the court. Despite that careful 25-page disposition of all of the
plaintiff’s claims, we now have 50 pages of briefs that provide only the same
allegations and new legal references but no support for plaintiff’s claims. The
problem for the plaintiff is the complete lack of any evidence of racial or gender
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-20761
Document: 00512693824
Page: 2
Date Filed: 07/10/2014
No. 13-20761
discrimination or unequal treatment, and of any basis for the claim of
procedural due process denial. No evidence connects different experience of
other teachers with the claims of discrimination and due process. And as for
due process, the plaintiff was given legal notice of non-renewal of his contract,
and he was given process by the Board of the District and the Commissioner of
Education.
AFFIRMED.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?