USA v. Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20771 Dismissed as frivolous] Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 07/06/2015 for Appellant Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Lee Harper Wilson [7688385-2] [13-20771]

Download PDF
Case: 13-20771 Document: 00513077163 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/12/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-20771 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 12, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. EDUARDO PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Eduardo Perez, also known as Eduardo Perez Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-495-1 Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw. He has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Rodriguez has not filed a response to either of counsel’s briefs. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-20771 Document: 00513077163 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/12/2015 No. 13-20771 We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?