USA v. Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-20771 Dismissed as frivolous] Judge: ECP , Judge: PRO , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 07/06/2015 for Appellant Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Lee Harper Wilson [7688385-2] [13-20771]
Case: 13-20771
Document: 00513077163
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/12/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-20771
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 12, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
EDUARDO PEREZ-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Eduardo Perez, also known
as Eduardo Perez Rodriguez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CR-495-1
Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Eduardo Perez-Rodriguez has
moved for leave to withdraw. He has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Perez-Rodriguez has not filed a
response to either of counsel’s briefs.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-20771
Document: 00513077163
Page: 2
Date Filed: 06/12/2015
No. 13-20771
We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal
presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?