USA v. Gilberto Bolanos-Escamilla

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-40590 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: LHS , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 03/24/2014 for Appellant Gilberto Bolanos-Escamilla; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Ms. Margaret Christina Ling [7460330-2] [13-40590]

Download PDF
Case: 13-40590 Document: 00512548983 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-40590 Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 3, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GILBERTO BOLANOS-ESCAMILLA, also known as Fidencio RodriguezGallegos, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-63-1 Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto BolanosEscamilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Bolanos-Escamilla has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-40590 Document: 00512548983 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2014 No. 13-40590 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?