USA v. Daniel Ramo
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-40726 Dismissed as Moot] Judge: PEH , Judge: EHJ , Judge: SAH. Mandate pull date is 07/08/2015 for Appellant Daniel Ramos [13-40726]
Case: 13-40726
Document: 00513082016
Page: 1
Date Filed: 06/17/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-40726
Summary Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
June 17, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
DANIEL RAMOS,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:12-CR-895-2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: *
Daniel Ramos appeals the six-month term of imprisonment that the
district court imposed upon revocation of his term of probation following his
conviction for aiding and abetting the unlawful transportation of an unlawful
alien. He argues that the district court committed reversible plain error by
failing to adequately consider the applicable guidelines range and failing to
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-40726
Document: 00513082016
Page: 2
Date Filed: 06/17/2015
No. 13-40726
consider the relevant sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a). The
Government argues that the appeal is moot.
Because Ramos has completed the six-month term of imprisonment, has
no further term of supervised release, and has no payments to make, this court
is unable to grant him any relief on his sentence. Thus, his sentencing appeal
is moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th Cir.
2007). The appeal is therefore DISMISSED as moot.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?