USA v. Francisco Gonzalez-Sanchez
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-40793 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: JLD , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 01/06/2015 for Appellant Francisco Gonzalez-Sanchez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Eric Joseph Davis [7515302-2] [13-40793]
Case: 13-40793
Document: 00512871149
Page: 1
Date Filed: 12/16/2014
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-40793
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
December 16, 2014
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
FRANCISCO GONZALEZ-SANCHEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:13-CR-230-1
Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Gonzalez-Sanchez has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in
accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Sanchez has filed responses
to counsel’s briefs. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions
of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Sanchez’s responses. We
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 13-40793
Document: 00512871149
Page: 2
Date Filed: 12/16/2014
No. 13-40793
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?