USA v. Francisco Gonzalez-Sanchez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-40793 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: CDK , Judge: JLD , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 01/06/2015 for Appellant Francisco Gonzalez-Sanchez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Eric Joseph Davis [7515302-2] [13-40793]

Download PDF
Case: 13-40793 Document: 00512871149 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/16/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 13-40793 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 16, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. FRANCISCO GONZALEZ-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13-CR-230-1 Before KING, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Francisco Gonzalez-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and a supplemental brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Sanchez has filed responses to counsel’s briefs. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Gonzalez-Sanchez’s responses. We Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 13-40793 Document: 00512871149 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/16/2014 No. 13-40793 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?