USA v. Steven Donoso

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [13-51181 Dismissed as Moot] Judge: TMR , Judge: JLD , Judge: LHS Mandate pull date is 12/01/2014 for Appellant Steven Donoso; denying as unnecessary motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Shannon Charles Hooks [7622410-2] [13-51181]

Case: 13-51181

Document: 00512828712

Page: 1

Date Filed: 11/06/2014

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-51181
Summary Calendar

United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit

FILED
November 6, 2014
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
STEVEN DONOSO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 6:08-CR-67-1

Before REAVLEY, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Steven Donoso has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Donoso has not filed a response.
During the pendency of this appeal, Donoso completed the 10-month
sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release and was released from

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*

Case: 13-51181

Document: 00512828712

Page: 2

Date Filed: 11/06/2014

No. 13-51181
custody. Because no additional term of supervised release was imposed, the
instant appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); United
States v. Clark, 193 F.3d 845, 847-48 (5th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, the appeal
is DISMISSED as moot, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED
as unnecessary.

2