USA v. Jose Martinez-Alvarez


UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-20012 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: EGJ , Judge: PEH , Judge: PRO Mandate pull date is 04/06/2015 for Appellant Jose Roberto Martinez-Alvarez; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Philip G. Gallagher [7646832-2] [14-20012]

Download PDF
Case: 14-20012 Document: 00512969436 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-20012 Conference Calendar FILED March 16, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE ROBERTO MARTINEZ-ALVAREZ, also known as Jose Alberto Martinez, also known as Jose Roberto Martine Alvarez, also known as Bladimir Rodriguez Tovar, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:13-CR-494-1 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Roberto Martinez-Alvarez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Alvarez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-20012 Document: 00512969436 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 No. 14-20012 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?