Holly Wilson v. State of Louisiana, et al

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-30472 Affirmed ] Judge: EHJ , Judge: CH , Judge: MAC Mandate pull date is 04/06/2015 [14-30472]

Download PDF
Case: 14-30472 Document: 00512970279 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 14-30472 FILED March 16, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk HOLLY L. WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant v. STATE OF LOUISIANA; UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA SYSTEM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; STEPHEN RICHTERS; JEFFREY CASS; NICK J. BRUNO, Ph.D., in his official capacity only; SANDRA LEMOINE, Ph.D. in her official capacity only, Defendants - Appellees Appeals from the United States District Court For the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:11-CV-1388 Before JONES and HAYNES, Circuit Judges, and CRONE ∗, District Judge. PER CURIAM: ** Plaintiff-Appellant Holly L. Wilson (“Wilson”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants on her claims that the defendants retaliated against her in violation of Title VII and violated her procedural and substantive due process rights, her state law * District Judge of the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. ** Case: 14-30472 Document: 00512970279 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2015 No. 14-30472 contractual rights regarding tenure, and the Contracts Clause of the United States Constitution. The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral arguments, pertinent portions of the record, and the Rule 28(j) submission. Having conducted a de novo review, and for essentially the reasons articulated by the district court, we find no reversible error and AFFIRM. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?