USA v. Rafael Galan-Castro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-40593 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: WED , Judge: EHJ , Judge: SAH Mandate pull date is 07/07/2015 for Appellant Rafael Santos Galan-Castro; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. H. Michael Sokolow [7713244-2] [14-40593]

Download PDF
Case: 14-40593 Document: 00513079680 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40593 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 16, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. RAFAEL SANTOS GALAN-CASTRO, also known as Rafael HernandezCastro, also known as Rafael Hernandez, also known as Rafael Castro, also known as Rafael Galan, also known as Victor Manuel Hernandez, also known as Nathan Hernandez, also known as Rafael Fernandez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:08-CR-749-1 Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael Santos Galan-Castro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galan-Castro has not filed a response. Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-40593 Document: 00513079680 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015 No. 14-40593 We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?