USA v. Angel Rodriguez-Estrada

Filing

UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-40826 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: TMR , Judge: JES , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 05/12/2015 for Appellant Angel Rodriguez-Estrada; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Philip G. Gallagher [7792612-2] [14-40826]

Download PDF
Case: 14-40826 Document: 00513013128 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 14-40826 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 21, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. ANGEL RODRIGUEZ-ESTRADA, also known as Jose Luis MartinezHernandez, also known as Angel Rodriguez, also known as Luis Martinez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13-CR-1178-1 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel RodriguezEstrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Estrada has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. * Case: 14-40826 Document: 00513013128 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2015 No. 14-40826 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?