USA v. Angel Rodriguez-Estrada
Filing
UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED. [14-40826 Dismissed as Frivolous] Judge: TMR , Judge: JES , Judge: JEG Mandate pull date is 05/12/2015 for Appellant Angel Rodriguez-Estrada; granting motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Philip G. Gallagher [7792612-2] [14-40826]
Case: 14-40826
Document: 00513013128
Page: 1
Date Filed: 04/21/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-40826
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
April 21, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
v.
ANGEL RODRIGUEZ-ESTRADA, also known as Jose Luis MartinezHernandez, also known as Angel Rodriguez, also known as Luis Martinez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:13-CR-1178-1
Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Angel RodriguezEstrada has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rodriguez-Estrada has not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
*
Case: 14-40826
Document: 00513013128
Page: 2
Date Filed: 04/21/2015
No. 14-40826
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?